How to subvert structures in a field that should be inclusive and interdisciplinary?
We all have ingrained ideas about how one should learn – how do we reverse those if structures aren’t working? Expand our outlooks/ worth with rather than against our own biases
Also, how to reform outside academia as well as within. You can “rebuild your own house.” Don’t need to be shaped by the conventional academy
Have to confront problems of “the old way” when creating a “new way”
democratization of information – in an ideal world, you don’t have to have a degree to go outside the academy to critique the academy
Do digital projects get peer reviewed? You still get stuck in the tenure-track mentality. And conversely, if you want to be on the tenure track, digital projects don’t always get counted.
If your project has a public audience, how do you readjust your metrics of success? It’s not like a scholarly book when you’re successful if you get published.
-You need metrics of success to get funded
Even if you’re outside the academy, you will probably still be in dialogue with the academy
National Museum of African American History is getting scholars to peer-review their exhibits
-But the public can also respond to it
-Also rely on individual knowledge and stories of community voices
-Not just an object is, but what it means and what stories are associated with it (rethinking the museum/exhibit)
Do you research and publish because you care about it/feel a moral duty or something else? Objectivity is an issue – sometimes you’re really excited about a topic and miss things. Expressing your research in different ways (digitally and in print, or in an exhibit) shows multiple sides and can create a more complete picture
Move from research to action – research can inspire social movements (public sociology). Also you can bring learning and activities to communities
Franz Boas Association – group of anthropologists and historians trying to do things with Franz Boas’s works, but also giving information back to Native Americans
-they have an indigenous advisory board
-undo the imperialism of anthropology
website: www.franzboaspapers.uwo.ca
While we’re on the topic of scholars sitting in a room talking about marginalized groups – let’s notice that we’re in a pretty non-diverse room – how did our ThatCamp get that way?
-Twitter might be helpful in reaching people who couldn’t be here – so THATCamp isn’t perfect, but it might be a step in the right direction. As it is, camp has been mostly publicized at the school, where there is not as much diversity as there might be.
There are a lot of situations where your intentions might be good, but the outcome is less than desired – for example, affirmative action primarily benefits white women (which is great), but not other marginalized groups (not great)
Eleanor Roosevelt Papers confronts the problem of being able to get the papers online, but the budget is not there, and it would not be in the spirit of Eleanor Roosevelt to put the papers behind the paywall. Information should be open access, and they hope to move towards democratization of information, but having trouble getting there
access is a huge problem – some databases cost hundreds of dollars to access, and some people can afford it – but many cannot!! (For a lot of students even, they’re only accessible if the library pays)
Do the rights of the public supercede the rights of the donors who gave the money or the documents? Issues when donors place restriction on collections
Students at GW are often required to have computers for classes, or they can’t take them – might alienate students who can’t afford computers. ProQuest also charges to make your dissertation open-access at Gelman, which makes students pay $200 (kind of a barrier to making everything open-access).
“You both have to live in the situation you’ve got and change the situation you’re in.” Idea of individual rather than collective responsibility can be problematic, but individual action might have to be the way to start on the right track
“Sharing data is like being seen without your pants on” – stigma makes open access scary to some people
Question at DH meetings ALWAYS seems to be about funding – have to build a community that is passionate about being open and sharing resources, to make the project more successful
Emilie Davis diary (davisdiaries.villanova.edu) – transcribed, annotated, made public access (great!) BUT a publisher came forward to give a book deal, so now the digital project doesn’t get updated in the same way, faces the problem of migration in a way it might not have if it had not been prepared for publication
In the academy you have an obligation to research and say “here’s reality,” but outside you can say “I don’t like that reality, let me try to change it.” (You hit a wall though, trying to fix reality in ways such as getting people to stop being jerks on the internet)
(Twitter and other platforms actually get help from trolls – hey, their site is getting a lot of hits! Oops
So maybe going corporate and trying to help platforms get rid of trolls might be even harder than you think.)
]]>
Digital Collections Outreach
Methods
Private communication with stakeholders is a criterion for judging whether or not a grant should be funded. Hence, communication with stakeholders combined with project planning is key.
User evaluation before a project can sometimes be equally helpful as a user evaluation after the project.
Audience
Understanding your audience is very important
Sometimes you don’t know who your audience is going to be so it’s best if you test it out first.
There is an important distinction between outreach and crowd sourcing.
Purpose of Outreach
Word of warning with Outreach, you have to understand who you’re sending content to and be wary of copyright laws.
You can’t be too cautious either because otherwise it won’t be too accessible. It needs to be easily accessible online for students, teachers etc.
Measuring outreach
]]>
Born Digital
Alice Prael, UMD Libraries
]]>
Tumblr, Flickr, and tools used by digital humanists
How do researchers think they might want to use Tumblr and Flickr information?
People don’t work with these sources because there is no access to that data, so what would the data be used for?
Ways digital humanists want to use digital technology, tools to make it accessible
Twitter- textual
Flickr- visual
Tumblr- mix
Scholarship on visual culture- researchers use images to visualize themes rather than use a mix for a more complex method
LOC twitter archive- unable to use because question of capacity
Maybe looking for stuff already known is out there
Look at what other fields and for profit companies use it for
Look at tweets to follow hashtags and subjects, see what they point to
Ex for project- undergrad looking for 100 tweets for a paper 0m #bringbackourgirls, candidates for office, social science research, ebola rumors,
Ed Summer’s work on tweets about Ferguson
Boston Marathon Bombing tweets video
Flickr- people who are not from professional archives post on Flickr
Instagram doesn’t allow the same sorting as Flickr
Gelman- open source project for Tumblr and Flickr
How easy is it to start a feed manager on twitter since a hashtag starts right at an event?
Tools-
Topsy- Twitter sentiment analysis
Eleanor Roosevelt Papers- looking for audio format to use for a source and online format
Transcripts
Audio preservation
Nodegoat- mapping tool
Gigapixel
Neatline
Bamboo
Storymap
Easy tools to create interactive maps- Storymap for the classroom
Utilizing other digital history projects within the classroom
Interactive options to engage the public
Cursive and handwriting issues with reading- crowdsourcing to transcribe
Skills people would like to learn-
Text and coding, TI, XML
Novice understanding, but learning TI would give confidence and help digital projects
Courses on coding at institutions to advance projects
Do you want to use more tools?
Problem- digital humanists don’t know the tools so they can’t make a project without learning the tools
Balancing- how accepted are these type of projects for grad school applications, tenure, job applications?
Better to have a project relevant to your work
Gelman- tech department resources for help with TI infrastructure and other options
]]>
]]>
DC THATCamp 2015: Supporting Other People’s DH
By Kat Bell
THATCamp DC 2015
Supporting Other People’s DH Projects
As a librarian, how can we help other division’s projects?
Between institutions, how can you offer your help?
How do we get the information out as to what we have? – Especially for Archives
Example of ride board – digital humanities ride board?
Practical questions of type of engagement, who will manage
Like LinkedIn, but something people would use
University of Nebraska Digital Humanists
Inclusiveness, accessibility
beta.worldcat.org/archivegrid/
More dynamic system than just Excel
Barriers to entry in sharing, collaborating, participating – service vs. research
dhcommons.org/collaborators
digitalhumanities.unc.edu/resources/projects/
Large historical societies – how they help sustain the small ones
Evaluation and marketing – librarians don’t have the needed skillset
Philadelphia History Bus
Personal Digital Archiving
Personal Digital Humanities
]]>
Digital History Projects 11:30-12:20
Some projects that got us started in digital history
Angela- US Holocaust Museum project Children of the Lodz Ghetto
Dan- Salem Witch Trials social network analysis
Jenna- Digital art history
Kate- tracking Shakespeare acting troupes
Glenn- PBS digitizing clips
Seth- Eleanor Roosevelt Papers looking to publish online
What is digital history- definitions
Using a broad definition to include collaboration and inter-disciplinary methods
New York Public Library Building Inspector- old maps to graph them, has a mobile version- crowdsourcing
Red Lining Project- mapping existing geography for areas red lined by banks
Lots of things are included in digital history
Finding sources born online- an old blog can disappear
Article on problem of Adobe Flash- multiple versions and capturing things on multiple levels of file versions
Archeology of Geocities
Maintaining projects- avoiding the 404 error
Funding issue
How to avoid this problem?
Projects that aren’t accessible to the public
Eleanor Roosevelt Papers- working on accessibility
Putting things online
Vast collections and maintaining that information through a database
Providing the public with the needs to meet their needs
Permission to release information
NYPL- beaker that shows how all digitized collections are connected- time, place, etc…
Learning how to combine disciplines- how to code
Making your project your own but using cross disciplines without jeopardizing your vision
Maybe multiple databases and making them open
Do no harm approach to creating content- opensource software, awareness of copyright, standard description
Insular culture of coding on your own that might make it harder for others to use the project- Good digital history practices
Serve your purpose and serve others through standardization
Retrospective conversion
Sheer number of software outthere to use that create their own parts but not the core. A 101 database for dummies to learn digital history projects
Metadata and software standards- some bibliographies give sites to help with that
Archive of digital history as a master catalogue
Discussing what best practices for digital history would be
White House Office of Science and Technology looking at big data projects- proposals must include support for reuse of the project- maybe using standard formats or reputable digital repositories that has standards to submit
Do No Harm Principle- don’t make it too difficult that no one would want to be involved, the goal is to promote secondary usage
International organizations and programs designed to promote a longstanding lifecycle of materials- digitized or born digital
More repositories and digital archives
Ask before starting to take advantage of repositories to design the project
Before standards- look at different projects
Folger- Shakespeare document- bring scholarship to a website for everyone but everyone at each level wants different things
Citations are different at organizations and conversations need to reflect the numbers of groups so one standard may be too much to ask for- appropriate practice of digital history
Figure out who the audience is and what they want- text, image, object, and encourage visiting to see something or use digital methods to show objects archives can’t let you see
Librarians and digital historians at a different perspective
Communication issue that THATCamp can help fix
Omeka used in some spheres and not mentioned as much in others- what platforms are used
Digital exhibitions, collections catalogue, press releases, events calander- not useful on Omeka or at least IT departments don’t think of Omeka as a resource
Omkea map project- digital history class
Reasonable accessibly- free to a limit of data and less expensive than other sources
How do you predict who sees the site?
Google analytics to see if the audience they want is already there- who visits a site?
UMD- analytics to see who looks at databases- a large viewership from Japan due to a collection related to WWII at the time and then that information helped them consider making the site more accessible to that audience
British Museum- on this day/artifact of the day with an extension saying “explore this collection”
Social media can bring the audience that way- tweets, Facebook posts, etc…
]]>These notes are an addendum to those provided by Dr. Cline. Session 2 provided an enlightening discussion regarding the challenges that face the Digital Humanities and the solutions that might solve troubling problems.
Conference 11:30 – 12:20
Host: Dr. Diane Cline
Title: What do we want? XX When do want it? Now.
Dr. Cline opens the conversation with a question: What do we want? Let’s talk about what we want or the problems that we face as digital historians or engaged workers.
Subject 1: What are the largest problems facing the digital humanities?
The Conversation Moved to Promoting This Training Idea:
Subject 2: Difference between History 1.0 and History 2.0
Publicity vs Privacy:
Representative from the 6 Degrees of Francis Bacon: Challenges include copyright and trademark restrictions which impede upon institutions ability to share
Challenges include the fact that publishers don’t want you to share information until after publication
It was noted that JSTOR will share information with you if you want
Subject 3: The Challenges of Limited Resources
Can Digital History be the solution to limited resources
“Behind the Paywall” – understanding the balance between sharing the documents and information. You CAN do both.
This is an old problem – before, the way to share information was to go to an academic conference and ask a scholar for the paper. How is this different? What should be shared and what should not be shared. The Digital Humanities is, inherently, more open. That doesn’t have to be a problem.
Dr. Cline mentioned that, once you understand what Digital History is, the transition from History 1.0 to History 2.0 is not nearly as cumbersome. However, there are a lot of people who do not know what “DH” is. That’s a problem, but one that is surmountable.
Conclusions and Things that we need:
Together, the group brainstormed the types of conferences and workshops that would be helpful for digital historians.
The organization of the conferences is key. “Learning on different Levels” – the best way to ensure that people network with the right professionals. This platform is called Rail Girls.
It’s easy to get discouraged in an up-and-coming, young field. Emphasize the fact that everything NEEDS TO BE Open Source.
The conversation ended with comments regarding the bureaucracy of organizations that own information. Organizations like Rotunda, which challenge open source progress.
Conclusions and Claims:
Here’s a thought: Can you position the Digital Humanities as a type of STEM programming? To receive funding and a community of support, can the Digital Humanities be considered a STEM program?
There seems to be a stirring of support. But, scholars in the Digital Humanities need to tailor their research the right way.
Showcasing how powerful the Digital Humanities can be, David McKenzie from the Ford’s Theatre shared how herds of supporters, tourists, and fans came out to the Ford’s Theatre for the anniversary of Lincoln’s assassination. Despite the challenges addressed, Digital History is alive and changing the way we think about yesterday and tomorrow.
]]>
What do we want? XX When do we want it? now!
TEI training camps
Getting most support off campus DH working group on English, Lori Brister Code
Art Library Society. aRLIS. Mentorships, unconventional mentoring up, younger people teaching older!!
Ask what are you working on?
How can I help?
Association of c and research libraries emphasize not calling it dH
We offer workshops and faculty don’t show up!
Need more one on one
Broader group in DC, sustainable MeetUp group DCHDC
Coding and coffee groups
Barriers include copyright restrictions.
Six degrees of Francis Bacon is here!
Archives Special Collections has dilemmas because they need to be aware of the Institutional Context. Measures of use?
With limited resources, digitizing isn’t priority. Need and desire for sharing information.
Paywall for materials, workshops behind them.
Folder has works in progress talks,
Little support for students to learn about grants at GMU.
Also using symposia for stimulating collaboration.
STEM priority.
How to get Humanities more support?
Sharing expertise
Joint grants ?
Need library workshops on lifecycle sustainability
Why people don’t come to workshops: different questions from different fields doesn’t work.
Useful might be when we tailor workshops to technical level and discipline.
Rails girls workshops for Ruby on Rails training, groups but also mentors.
Finders demanding TEI, plans for online and sustainability.
Technology develops so rapidly and early adopters can get behind.
Open access is key. Policy, principle. Struggle between finders and institutions.
Rotunda at UVa is a paywall but calls themselves Open Access, huh?
funding for computational collaborations in engineering, MITH has done collaborations with computer scientists.
Engineering is also Entrepreneurial
ISchool cross over thing.
Community client program at Carnegie Mellon, students use computational techniques to do humanities , could work.